Latest News

Just in case: LIPA generators coming to the Island
South Ferry hopes dredging can be done to avoid crisis
Dr. Hynes to speak at League of Women Voters annual meeting
Bryan’s song: First Islander across the 10K finish line
Three-run homer sinks Bucks against North Fork Ospreys
Bausman steps down as Island Red Cross CEO
Merchants, board look to lower speed on Bridge St.
More photos from the Shelter Island 10K
Ethiopian wins Shelter Island 10K Run
AFTER THE RACE: Check out how all the participants did

Sports

Bryan’s song: First Islander across the 10K finish line

June 17, 2013

Three-run homer sinks Bucks against North Fork Ospreys

June 17, 2013

More photos from the Shelter Island 10K

June 16, 2013

Education

$2.8 million school building project begins this month

June 11, 2013

Nonprofit day care in Greenport faces hard times, may close

June 8, 2013

This week in Shelter Island history

June 7, 2013

Business

South Ferry hopes dredging can be done to avoid crisis

June 18, 2013

Merchants, board look to lower speed on Bridge St.

June 17, 2013

Driveway settlement? Judge may impose decision

June 13, 2013

Community

Bausman steps down as Island Red Cross CEO

June 17, 2013

Photos: The Island gets ready for another big race day

June 15, 2013

Letter: Welcome to the 34th Annual Shelter Island 10K

June 15, 2013

Obituaries

Obituary: Barbara Joy Roberts Carlsen

May 28, 2013

Obituary: Reporter staffer David Lee Draper

May 20, 2013

Obituaries: Elmer August Kestler Jr., Lawrence William Sliker

May 9, 2013

Real Estate

Real Estate: The evolution of Greenport's architecture

June 9, 2013

$400K driveway? Owners, landscaper in tangle of suits

May 30, 2013

This week in Shelter Island history

May 30, 2013

Opinion

Letters to the Editor: Dark skies, pro and con

June 13, 2013

Letters to the Editor

June 11, 2013

From Penelope's kitchen: Pacaya Flowers and Yucca Blossoms

June 10, 2013

Suffolk Closeup: Long Island Power Authority’s lost way

Whatever happened to the original vision of what the Long Island Power Authority was to be — a democratic entity through which Long Islanders would determine their own energy future?

Governor Andrew Cuomo this month declared that “LIPA basically was supposed to be a holding company and more of a pass-through operation.” It has instead “strayed from” that role, Mr. Cuomo said as he ordered a review of LIPA to find “synergies” with other state agencies and state contractors.

But Governor Cuomo is missing the point about what LIPA was to be about.

LIPA was created under the Long Island Power Act of 1985 with three major goals:

1) Stopping the Long Island Lighting Company from moving ahead with its Shoreham nuclear power plant and the other six to 10 nuclear plants LILCO wanted to build;

2) Getting Long Island to go in another direction in energy — toward safe, clean, renewable power;

3) Having Long Island’s energy future decided democratically, with an elected LIPA board. A model was the Sacramento Municipal Utility District in California, which also got rid of a nuclear power plant and, through a democratic process led by SMUD’s elected board members, championed the development of solar and wind power.

Unfortunately, very unfortunately, Andrew Cuomo’s father, Mario Cuomo, as governor at the time, postponed the first election of LIPA board members. The elder Cuomo backed the creation of LIPA but he eliminated this key element. Then his successor, Governor George Pataki, formally revoked the provision calling for an elected LIPA board. As a result, the infamous “three-men-in-a-room” who dominate New York government — the governor, the State Assembly speaker and the State Senate leader — have chosen the LIPA board members. Most have had no energy background. They are political appointees.

Meanwhile, the Senate has not acted on legislation passed by the Assembly to restore democracy to LIPA. Several times the Assembly has passed a bill (most recently in 2010), co-sponsored by Assemblyman Fred W. Thiele Jr. of Sag Harbor, restoring an elected LIPA board.

What’s the Senate’s problem? “Elected officials in both parties in the Senate fear that an elected LIPA board might become a farm team for people to run for the legislature,” explained Mr. Thiele, an Independent. “It’s just the political culture trying to protect itself.” Having candidates for the LIPA board discussing energy issues and getting public exposure is too much for these politicians.

“Tell Governor Cuomo: LIPA Needs Elections, Not More Privatization,” declares Ian Wilder of North Babylon, former co-chair of the Green Party of New York State, on his website, onthewilderside.com.

Governor Cuomo “wants to turn LIPA into a shell that outsources all functions,” says Mr. Wilder. “Now, more than ever, there is a desperate need for visionary leadership … We must turn LIPA into a model of sustainable energy. Long Island has the ability to harvest solar and offshore wind on a grand scale … If LIPA had elected directors, we could have a public debate of its direction and vote for leaders who would take it into the future rather than the past.”

Says Mr. Thiele of Governor Cuomo’s LIPA move: “Long Island’s public utility has been more accountable to Albany than [it is to] Long Island … Any reforms should focus on the establishment of a long-term energy plan for Long Island that provides energy security and lower rates. It must also increase local accountability and control. So-called ‘reforms’ that only serve to place more of Long Island’s energy future in the hands of other Albany bureaucrats will not be acceptable. I envision true reform as being a LIPA that is controlled by Long Islanders and that has real authority to pursue renewable energy sources, energy conservation and lower utility rates. A key part of such reform must include an elected Board of Trustees.”

Governor Cuomo’s call for LIPA “reform” would be a good thing only if it means a return to the original dream of Long Islanders deciding their own energy future democratically. In the name of “synergies,” enmeshing LIPA into the New York Power Authority — a sprawling bureaucracy with an appointed board — or with big private power companies will further destroy what was a wonderful and now more-than-ever needed energy vision.